Copyright compare b2c/b2b Corporate genius Thinking
B2B and B2C Secure Instant Messaging Privacy
In life the people that we trust the most are those individuals that provide close consultations to us: our spouse, family and friends. Likewise, secure and successful e-commerce business owners are most likely to loan trust to those that qualify, were a good relationship has been built up. This is true no matter if you qualify as a B2B or a B2C company website on the Internet.
Technically this important trust relationship is built by the three ethical "heart and soul" e-commerce issues in B2B and B2C business marketing ethics: Honesty, Integrity, and Trustworthiness.
Recently, I was invited by a friend to join in on a conversation on one of the instant messenger services provided by an online service provider. It was an ebusiness marketing issues related conversation. I mentioned to him that I did not approve the use of that service to discuss business because I did not trust their company's website.
He asked, "Jim, what is the difference about using that one compared to some other service?"
I told him, "It is all about trust!" I went on to state, "Take a look at their legal privacy policy information."
He came back to ask, "You mean you actually read all that privacy policy stuff?"
"Yea, I now started reading that privacy stuff," I said.
I discovered that the so called customers' privacy policies vary all over the board.
Compare Policies Online
One company's global direct marketing privacy policy states that they do not share the private information resources with outside sources. The policy articles went on to state they will share the information with other members of the online organization. Important Note: anyone can be a free member of this particular organization. Another company had very specific, personal information that was shared with their PPC advertisers, while another online service would keep all information confidential for the customers' whole life duration period.
Websites are a reflection of businesses on the Internet. The three principal keys in doing e business: Honesty, integrity, and trustworthiness crossover directly to the website framework and the Internet. This is especially true for the online service providers. Professional service providers have the funds and staff of programmers to do the Global Web Site right and after all, that is their principal business specialty on a very large scale. But, sad to say, doing websites right (based on the three b2c/b2b principles) is not always true for some of these big online providers. In fact, there are many eBusiness regulatory perspective, ethical, copyright, and electronic commerce global legal issues at prominence.
When I say doing websites right, I am not referring to how the website displays the information or the menu style for navigating the site, or even how much new or relevant information is on their site. What I am saying is: "How is this business operating online in relation to ethical website integrity? Are they acting in a responsible manner? Is what is portrayed about their website factual? Is what is said about others accurate and true? Is the foundation built with ethical integrity? Are they being honest with the B2C and B2B community at large? Can I trust them?"
So, how do these three principal B2B and B2C business points: honesty, integrity, and trustworthiness "plug and play" on the various websites and compare for both large and small companies?
In essence, they "plug and play" in the market place, with financial transactions in the form of online B2B and B2C advertising, Stocks ROI%, SEC Forward-looking statements, profitability, rates of return on investments, customers and branding over time.
Time is a key element for a company's success strategies on the Web. As companies build brand awareness (sometimes excellent brand building, other times not so good) with the public through the professional services and products sold or delivered it establishes the trustworthiness or lack of trust, of a company. If a company is not honest it could have short-term and long-term costs for them. This will manifest itself in all likely-hood by consumers nationwide giving low voting rates of no confidence causing a downward interest in a website. That vote can occur in the media in a number of ways. It can significantly penalize them in the form of: number of website visitors, weblogs reports (i.e. news reports), SWOT analysis reporting, or the money invested in the financial stock market or futures place. It might also disclose itself in a penalty by the number of links to a website. If the links are deemed by a number of other top quality resource sites to not be as high a quality in value then most likely there will be a migration from the poor site to another where quality information can be found.
The Entire Web
Thoughts and ideas from individuals or groups sharing technical information [wiki] is the one ingredient which provides the glue that holds the web together. Without new Copy from individuals the web would just be a collection of the same thing from all B2C and B2B websites. In fact you can see this reflected now in some search engines intentionally copying information in the form of snippets and then feeding it back into other search engine results just to have their own search engine website at the top of the results of another's search engine.
As I stated a few times before, a while back I saved four results on our server in order to point something else out about a particular engine. This was a huge mistake because the search engine cataloged the pages. When I realized the error I promptly removed the pages. While I made a mistake, it appears as though large and not so large companies are doing it intentionally in the form of saving their own search results and feeding it back into other Search companies. A mind-blowing observation about these removed pages is, sometimes they are showing up and sometimes they are not. It is as though they are telling me, see you did it. Well, I am telling you what happened. Are they?
In addition it now appears as though some natural results are still being fabricated at some global search companies. Additionally some companies are simply copying the results from one global search engine and placing it into their page with absolutely no other content except to get a good standing in the search results.
So you ask, "Ok, so what is the point? How does it affect me? Why should I be concerned?" What is the solution?
The point is: With the record number of new pages added annually to the Internet if all they are is just a big collection of repeated material what is going to differentiate one SITE from that of another? If the majority of pages are just plagiarizing that of others then the Internet will become nothing more than a scrap heap and it will become increasing difficult to find the information of interest in the future.
Technical Professional and success strategies
So how do you successfully make a difference? By employing "A Collaborative Innovation Network - COIN". The thinking process is actually fairly simple: Your vote of trust. I am not saying start a local, national, or international voting booth process where basis points from highest to lowest rates are given for each website, but do market research (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats – SWOT analysis) online yourselves and lock in the link to the best quality websites for your particular category. If everyone were to just lock in a few quality links this would establish a new paradigm. Instead of just thinking about yourselves, think about others. Ask yourself some questions: Is this link helpful and of interest to your website visitors? Does this link provide quality information to my visitors? Is the information superficial or detailed? By linking to a particular website what is that saying about my site? Is my brand helped or hurt by this link?
In the long run by helping others you will in turn help insure yourself. This will be because others will be doing the exact same thing and establishing an association of trust that will be reflected in their vote toward you with a quality link themselves toward you, especially when providing good original content material. In essence this will be insuring a ring of trust that can be proven logically. By providing a quality link yourself to another website you will be saying that X site has information that I agree with, thus my SITE will become associated with the other site by association. At the same time the sites that are not providing quality info will not be successfully supported by association and will most likely be viewed as not as trustworthy.
If everyone were to just go through to qualify the best B2B and B2C websites for new links on their own website by asking those same questions I truly believe you would start a voting booth record in your own mind and would venture to say you would see a number of changes in the nature of linking on the Internet. I think we would see the link farms locked into the trash bin. Some are trying to justify that they do not link to a link-farm but if you are really honest with yourself I think you would see it differently. I have viewed some pages that the authors said were not link farms but when it gets right down to it, that is what they are.
Take the time now and start going through your B2C and B2B websites and ask yourself the questions to qualify your links. Look through your body text and provide link text information that supports your position and also provides additional helpful info. If just a small percentage of people started doing this I believe it could have a major impact on the world of search.
New examples of how this works:
I have been doing extensive "B2B VS. B2C", B2B marketing strategies, marketing on B2B site, Internet marketing, & B2B B2C difference research online. I have built into our website a large collection of links that provides information for the global world of "Professional B2B Marketing + "B2C" Services Successful Strategies Business Websites and Technical Solutions," plus "B2B and B2C Marketing Ethics In Business And Advertising ethics and B2B" In addition I have in-depth market research into the "Importance of Ethics B2B and B2C Web Site Ethics Ethical Internet Standards" & "How Do B2B And B2C Use Branding?" Each and every link on every single page was placed with asking the qualifying questions above. Each qualifying link not only tells a story but provides a source of information. The majority of the B2B and B2C links are to a website I place the most trust in.
It's Imperative!
What are you waiting for? Compare now! Do the research analysis on the Internet and compare for yourself. Not doing anything could cost you. I am challenging each and everyone to start making a crucial difference today with your vote. Compare how your online vote of trust today, will start making a crucial difference for you tomorrow, and that is a Promise. "Quote" James A. Warholic
Professional Web Services, Inc., + PWEBS.net, and ProfessionalWebServices.Blogspot.com Privacy Policy
Above All - Tell It Like It Is, And Do It With Style!
Use - Trust
http://professionalwebservices.blogspot.com/2004/09/ trust-q.html#trust+q
References
B2B vs B2C website & i t w a, b2b trust issues same as b2c, technical professional and success strategies, e-business ethical issues , web page security, IT security requirements message, business advertising, no Bull SWOT Analysis, research, results oriented internet marketing services (ROIMS), b2b vs b2c ethics, medical information, healthcare providers online E-MAIL, HIPAA Privacy [Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996], & other forms of electronic E-MAIL communication Consumer Privacy issues. "CPACSA" [Consumer Protection Against Computer Spyware Act]
0 comments:
Post a Comment